What the authorities say about the Ramazzini paper
European Food Safety Authority (EFSA)
Based on current evidence on the safety of aspartame, EFSA does not recommend
that consumers who wish to choose foods containing aspartame make any changes to their dietary habits.
Source: EFSA press release 29 November 2005
EFSA does not consider it appropriate to suggest any change in consumers'
diets relative to aspartame on the basis of the information it currently
has.
Source: EFSA press release 14 July 2005
United Kingdom government: Caroline Flint, Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Health
The current advice from the Food Standards Agency remains in place, namely
that aspartame is safe for use in food.
Source: Hansard record of the debate on artificial sweeteners held on 14 December, 2005
United Kingdom Department of Health Committee on Carcinogenicity (COC)
Members considered that it was implausible that there should be only a small
increase in a tumour incidence over such a wide range of doses. They also
commented that there may be a reasonable explanation for the differing
historical control figures but that the low incidence in the female control
group compared to all other groups cast doubt on the study. Members were
critical of the study design in that rats were allowed to live until a natural
death. It was noted that the statistical approach used, although
survival-related, did not fully adjust for age-related effects. The study will
be evaluated formally by the EFSA.
Source: Draft minutes of the meeting of the committee meeting held on 14 July, available from the COC web site.
United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA)
The FDA has not recommended any changes to the use of aspartame. George
Pauli, of the FDA office of food additive safety, has stated "We have seen a lot of very solid data and are very comfortable with it."
Source: Nature 18 November 2005
Food Safety Authority of Ireland
The Food Safety Authority of Ireland considers that the findings need to be
carefully evaluated by EFSA before their significance for the safety of
aspartame can be determined. FSAI awaits further details to become available,
either from EFSA or from the institute that carried out the studies on
aspartame. In the meantime, FSAI concurs with the EFSA view that there is no
basis for recommending any changes in consumers' diets in respect of aspartame,
given the limited information currently available regarding the new study.
Source: FSAI web site
Health Canada
... based on the limited new information available, Health Canada does not have a basis for recommending any dietary changes relating to the use of aspartame.
Source: Health Canada web site 18 July 2005
Brazil: Technical Chamber on Foods
There are no statistical data which show a direct link between the
development of (lymphomas and leukaemia in rats) and the consumption of aspartame.
There are no public health reasons with a scientific basis to prohibit
aspartame or to recommend a change in the diet of the population.
Source: Technical Report 19 January, 2006