The NutraSweet Company v. Guardian Newspapers Limited:
statement in open court on settlement of action
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE QUEEN'S BENCH DIVISION |
1990 N No.1680 |
| BETWEEN: |
THE NUTRASWEET
COMPANY
-V-
GUARDIAN NEWSPAPERS LIMITED
STATEMENT IN
OPEN COURT ON SETTLEMENT OF ACTION |
Counsel for the Plaintiff: This is an action for damages for libel and
malicious falsehood brought by The NutraSweet Company against Guardian
Newspapers Limited in respect of allegations published in the Guardian Newspaper
on 20th and 21st July 1990.
On 20th and 21st July 1990, the Defendant published a series of articles in
the Guardian Newspaper about NutraSweet brand sweetener, describing the
circumstances in which the US Food and Drug Administration ("the FDA") granted
approval for the use of NutraSweet and commenting on its safety. The articles
contained a number of serious libels and malicious falsehoods against the
Plaintiff including suggestions that some of the laboratory tests submitted by
the Plaintiff to the FDA in the early 1970s had been faked and that there were
grounds for doubting the safety of aspartame.
In the circumstances, the Plaintiff was compelled to issue proceedings at
once in order to vindicate its name and that of its product.
The Defendant now accepts that there was no deliberate falsification of data
and that there was nothing in the test data to demonstrate that NutraSweet was,
in fact, unsafe for human consumption. Further, the Defendant now accepts that
no connection has been established between adverse symptoms and the use of
NutraSweet and indeed, that the Plaintiff have invested significant resources in
investigating complaints and have found no scientific basis for suggesting a
causal link between these adverse symptoms and NutraSweet.
The Defendant is here today by its Counsel to withdraw these allegations and
offer its apologies to the Plaintiff for the damage caused by publication of
these articles and to withdraw unreservedly all imputations upon the Plaintiff.
In addition, in recognition of the wrong done, the Guardian have agreed to pay a
substantial sum in damages and costs to the Plaintiff.
As the Plaintiff brought these proceedings with the primary object of
clearing its name and that of its product, the Plaintiff is content now to let
the matter rest.
Counsel for the Defendant: I wish to associate myself, on behalf of the
Defendant, with all that has been said by Counsel for the Plaintiff and to
repeat the Defendant's regret that these unwarranted and false statements were
ever made.
Counsel for the Plaintiff: I ask for an Order in the terms of the draft
Consent Order before your Lordship